Guide: Researcher Toolkit

[daniellex0]

Overview

We need to create a UX Researcher Toolkit so that UX Researchers at Hack for LA can have many helpful resources to reference in one place.

Action Items

• Research insightful and helpful UX Research resources in online articles, slack communities, and other relevant sources
  • Once done, remove the "Guide: Research" label and add the "Guide: Gather Examples" label
• Gather examples of research documentation and resources some UX researchers at Hack for LA have created/used
  • Once done, remove the "Guide: Gather Examples" label and add the "Guide: Draft Guide" label
• Create a draft Toolkit document, either in markdown format in this issue or a google doc in the [ux/ui google drive]
  • Once done, remove the "Guide: Draft Guide" label and add the "Guide: Review Guide" label
• Review the Toolkit document with UX/UI community of practice
  • Once done, remove the "Guide: Review Guide" label and add the "Guide: Leadership Review" label
• Present to the Hack for LA leadership team for sign off
  • Once approved, remove the "Guide: Leadership Review" label and add the "Guide: Place Guide" label

Resources

Update issue hackforla/knowledgebase-content#97 with the name of item you are working on
Guide Draft

[daniellex0]

Examples of resources that can be included in the toolkit:

• Code for America Qualitative Research Guide
• Examples of HfLA UX Research
• UX Research Soft Skills guide

[ExperimentsInHonesty]

A sample of the new guide format that we are using:https://docs.google.com/document/d/1T-h3YJ8Pp4hsfq9ouRHRnwrrHROSz0-kQz5O9VTE62U/edit#

[nagesh23nayak]

https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fPBoNEv44ApGwZQHqbdIcoD3B2UI-lvI3L6BpHig2fY/edit#

[Jane4925]

@daniellex0 The review is done! @nagesh23nayak great job! The contents are very useful!

[ExperimentsInHonesty]

@nagesh23nayak I see that there are comments from peer reviews in your document. Are you able to keep working on this guide or do you want someone else to finish it up?

[ExperimentsInHonesty]

@Jane4925 @mklmrgn are you finished with your peer reviews?

[Jane4925]

@ExperimentsInHonesty I did finish the peer review, see comment above

[mklmrgn]

@ExperimentsInHonesty Yep! This was completed back in April. Let me know if there's anything that needs to be done to follow up.

[ExperimentsInHonesty]

@nagesh23nayak it looks like you received the peer review on the guide. Will you review their comments and make appropriate updates, or do you want to be unassigned from this?

[ExperimentsInHonesty]

bumping this back into your inbox just in case @nagesh23nayak it looks like you received the peer review on the guide. Will you review their comments and make appropriate updates, or do you want to be unassigned from this?

[ExperimentsInHonesty]

@nagesh23nayak we have not heard from you, so we are going to unassign this issue.

[InbalRL]

Hi @Nazilakl
I saw this guide (Researcher Toolkit #22 guide) on the UX/UI Backlog tab with the "Adopt me!" tag so I assigned it myself, but then I noticed you are already assigned yourself to it.
I wanted to ask if you are working on it. If not, I would love to take it!
Thanks,
Inbal

[mklmrgn]

I was working on this a loooooong time ago. Please take it! ᐧ

…

On Mon, Feb 20, 2023 at 8:17 PM InbalRL ***@***.***> wrote: Hi @Nazilakl <https://github.com/Nazilakl> I saw this guide (Researcher Toolkit hackforla/UI-UX#22 <#22> guide) on the UX/UI Backlog tab with the "Adopt me!" tag so I assigned it myself, but then I noticed you are already assigned yourself to it. I wanted to ask if you are working on it. If not, I would love to take it! Thanks, Inbal — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#22 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ATRTBGSHWXCZSVO3IV7EOZDWYQ6UBANCNFSM4YBDQ3VA> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[InbalRL]

@mklmrgn I would love to learn more about what you have accomplished on this guide so far. Will you be available for a 30 min meeting?

[Aparna1Gopal]

As per Instructions moving this to prioritized Backlog