Consider adding options for scaffolding - "verbose" vs. "minimal"

[austinvalle]

References

• Mentioned in a different/but related context: Add Example Attributes Of All Types terraform-provider-scaffolding-framework#174
• This idea was also mentioned in a partner demo in reference to the actual scaffold command

Context

There seems to be an appetite for the scaffold function to provide different levels of information in the skeleton that is created:

• Minimal, no deleting of code needed, resource/datasource/provider code file
• Verbose, comments explaining pieces of code, showing different data handling function, like mentioned here

No proposal right now, maybe the scaffold command isn't the right place for this, but wanted to document this before I forget 😃

[bflad]

Yeah there's certainly been asks in both directions for this verbosity. I'm not sure we'll ever satisfy everyone. Maybe we can point folks at (and potentially a code comment in the scaffolding repo) https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-corner/blob/main/internal/framework6provider/schema_resource.go although I'm honestly really not sure the benefit without also showing real data handling. Maybe we should just make a terraform-provider-examplecloud or something with its own fake "API SDK" package with types, client, and "API" operations.