Skydoc functioned by evaluating Starlark files as if they were Python. Unfortunately, while Starlark is similar to Python, there are some important syntactic differences between the languages. Assuming compatibility between the languages was inherently brittle, and resulted in a maintenance burden on the Starlark code. Specifically, if one of your transitive dependencies were to adopt a Starlark-compatible, Python-incompatible construct, your Skydoc integration would break!
Skydoc still exists under bazelbuild/skydoc, as it's a nontrivial migration to Stardoc, but Skydoc is completely unsupported as of September 2019. The bazelbuild/skydoc will be archived by end of 2019.
Stardoc is not a drop-in replacement for Skydoc. Its usage is slightly different, and it has some new features. It's recommended to take a look at the root Stardoc documentation, but here is a brief summary of some things to note for migration:
Stardoc uses inline documentation strings instead of Python-style docstrings. For example, Skydoc documentation may have been specified with:
my_rule = rule(
implementation = _my_rule_impl,
attrs = {
"srcs": attr.label_list(),
"deps": attr.label_list(),
},
)
"""Example rule documentation.
Example:
Here is an example of how to use this rule.
Args:
srcs: Source files used to build this target.
deps: Dependencies for this target.
"""
...the equivalent for Stardoc is:
my_rule = rule(
implementation = _my_rule_impl,
doc = """
Example rule documentation.
Example:
Here is an example of how to use this rule.
""",
attrs = {
"srcs" : attr.label_list(
doc = "Source files used to build this target.",
),
"deps" : attr.label_list(
doc = "Dependencies for this target.",
),
}
)
Stardoc uses a different Starlark rule than Skydoc with different attributes.
See Generating Documentation for a
tutorial on using the new rule, and the
Build Rule Reference for information
about the new stardoc
rule itself.
Stardoc depends on your bzl
file, all of its dependencies, and all of its transitive
dependencies, so that it can fully evaluate your Starlark code.
bazel-skylib
's bzl_library
is the recommend approach for tracking bzl
dependencies.
For example, suppose your mypackage/foo.bzl
file depends on other/package/bar.bzl
, which
depends on third/package/baz.bzl
.
BUILD:
load("@io_bazel_stardoc//stardoc:stardoc.bzl", "stardoc")
stardoc(
name = "foo_docs",
input = "foo.bzl",
out = "foo_doc.md",
deps = ["//other/package:bar"],
)
other/package/BUILD:
load("@bazel_skylib//:bzl_library.bzl", "bzl_library")
bzl_library(
name = "bar",
srcs = ["bar.bzl"],
deps = ["//third/package:baz"],
)
third/package/BUILD:
load("@bazel_skylib//:bzl_library.bzl", "bzl_library")
bzl_library(
name = "baz",
srcs = ["baz.bzl"],
)
Thus, each .bzl
file should appear in the srcs
of a bzl_library
target defined in the same
package. The deps
of this bzl_library
should be (only) the bzl_library
targets corresponding
to the files that are directly load()
ed by the srcs
. This structure mirrors that of other
<language>_library
rules in Bazel.
This migration might involve creating a large number of new bzl_library
targets,
but this work is useful beyond Stardoc. For example, bzl_library
can be also used to gather
transitive Starlark dependencies for use in shell tests or other test frameworks.
See Generating Documentation for a tutorial.
If you run into any issues migrating, please file a GitHub issue.