Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEAT] Switch away from gocolly to pure goquery #400

Open
aleksasiriski opened this issue Sep 22, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

[FEAT] Switch away from gocolly to pure goquery #400

aleksasiriski opened this issue Sep 22, 2024 · 0 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@aleksasiriski
Copy link
Member

aleksasiriski commented Sep 22, 2024

Since gocolly is pretty much abandoned and has some cruial features missing and some minor quirks, it would be better to switch to a custom impl using the great goquery and doing needed gocolly logic in a package of our own. This could also bring the binary size down (not sure though).

@aleksasiriski aleksasiriski added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant