Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

How to add new disease and anatomy nodes #42

Open
Vittoria9 opened this issue Aug 10, 2021 · 2 comments
Open

How to add new disease and anatomy nodes #42

Vittoria9 opened this issue Aug 10, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@Vittoria9
Copy link

Hi,

I am new to this area and would greatly appreciate any insight on the following:

  1. What is the process of adding new disease and anatomy nodes? Can these be developed in a modular format?
  2. Is there consensus amongst the computational chemists / toxicologists on the gold standard for nomenclature to use in in silico models / knowledge graphs?

Many thanks.
Best regards,
V

@Vittoria9 Vittoria9 changed the title Add new disease and anatomy nodes How to add new disease and anatomy nodes Aug 10, 2021
@Vittoria9
Copy link
Author

Hi Daniel,

Is this project still being actively maintained or has it been deprecated?

Thanks.
V

@dhimmel
Copy link
Member

dhimmel commented Sep 7, 2021

Hi @Vittoria9. Apologies for the slow response.

Is this project still being actively maintained or has it been deprecated?

Hetionet v1.0 doesn't receive scheduled updates. We still assist with user questions and are developing downstream applications like connectivity search.

What is the process of adding new disease and anatomy nodes? Can these be developed in a modular format?

The discussion at #34 might be helpful here. The integrate.ipynb notebook is what combines all the nodes and edges into a single network. You can look through that notebook to find which datasets are consumed for disease and anatomy nodes. You could then go to those upstream repositories, fork them, and then update the nodes as you wish. For diseases, the upstream repo is https://github.com/dhimmel/disease-ontology and for anatomy nodes it is https://github.com/dhimmel/uberon.

Is there consensus amongst the computational chemists / toxicologists on the gold standard for nomenclature to use in in silico models / knowledge graphs?

Not sure. You can read about what we did for this project at https://doi.org/10.15363/thinklab.d40 and in the manuscript.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants