Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Meta-issue: Revision of FunctionSurj #55

Open
5 tasks
TentativeConvert opened this issue Jul 5, 2024 · 0 comments
Open
5 tasks

Meta-issue: Revision of FunctionSurj #55

TentativeConvert opened this issue Jul 5, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@TentativeConvert
Copy link
Collaborator

I collect here things that need to happen in FunctionSurj

  • add zeroeth level to introduce notation f : A → B for functions or try make this notation visible in level 1 – see FunctionSurj, Level 1: Type of f is not displayed. #54 (comment)
  • decide whether we can implement polyrith, and if not, whether we want to keep manual linear_combination in level 6; if not: delete/replace this level
  • swap levels 4 (right inverse) and 5 (left inverse): the fact that left inverse is defined in terms of right inverse is already obvious in current level 4 to anyone who cares to unfold the definition
  • add hints to levels 4, 6, … ? …
  • Marcus: rewrite story
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant