New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Missing Edges in Undirected Form of SCOTUS Network #1

Open

michaelkkim opened this issue Sep 4, 2016 · 0 comments

Collaborator

michaelkkim commented Sep 4, 2016 •

edited

Loading

587 edges get removed when converting SCOTUS Network into undirected form--see:
"/explore/michael/missing_edges_SCOTUS_undirected.ipynb"

This is most likely because of many of the 587 edges (or possibly all of them) connect the two same cases with different court_id's.
Example: 1521208 -> 98215 and 98215 -> 1521208
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/98215/new-york-life-insurance-company-plff-in-err-v-richard-g-head-jr-by/
https://www.courtlistener.com/opinion/1521208/new-york-life-ins-co-v-head/

Remove these repeated cases after the conference

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment