funs are formatted incorrectly

[brigadier]

this is how they are formatted now:

This is how I think is the correct way to format a fun:

btw, the rest of operators are formatted correctly :

[ignatov]

Hi!

Am I right that you're trying to do the following

foo() ->
  fun(A, B) ->
    lists:seq(1, 2)
  end,
ok.

[kvakvs]

@ignatov as usually a standalone fun expression makes no sense, you usually have them in an assignment or a function call. So the fun will not begin at the start of the line, like so:

foo() ->
  X = fun(A, B) ->
    lists:seq(1, 2)
  end.
% or
bar() ->
  quux(fun(X) -> 
    hello 
  end).

And this would do wrong indents. Acceptable indentation would be either: a) single indent from the expression start, and then closing end lined up with the expression start. Or b) use fun as starting column offset, line end up to it (i think this is the current behaviour), and line up function contents between them indented (this is not happening now, at least not consistent with the end)

[brigadier]

Hi!

Am I right that you're trying to do the following

As kvakvs said above funs are usually used in assignments, as parameters of function calls and very rarely standalone (only when you mean to return the fun as the result), so I think funs should be treated (and they are!) just like any other block construction such as case, if and begin - their content should be aligned relative to their opening word. Funs are not a special case, they are really the same as if, case etc