You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Just thoughts (I've been playing too much DF lately):
A species is an evolutionary line--from the iiag standpoint, it's more of a group or faction which individuals identify with, and thus should be documented as such.
A creature is a singular individual (which possesses or identifies with one specie), and could have its own documented history.
I that was how I was thinking of differentiating between "creatures" and "persons". Your terminology makes more sense though. My question is more geared towards things like how fbir and gnats were different creature types in iiag, but were of the same species.
I would imagine its just like races in the real world where we have
different types of birds but ones bird of the same species would be able to
procreate.
On Tue, Mar 31, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Chris Harding [email protected]
wrote:
I that was how I was thinking of differentiating between "creatures" and
"persons". Your terminology makes more sense though. My question is more
geared towards things like how fbir and gnats were different creature types
in iiag, but were of the same species.
—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub #7 (comment).
Should we, and if so, how?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: