You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I see the warning that in the future, the redun_namespace variable will need to be set on the module-level and/or the namespace provided in the @task. Personally, I would like to make an alternate suggestion: make the default namespace for each task be task.func.__module__. The combination of the __module__ in the namespace and the __name__ in the name will yield a unique identifier in virtually all practical cases.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Andrew-S-Rosen
changed the title
Suggestion: Make a unique, default redun_namespace for each @task
Suggestion: Make the default name for @tasks be task.func.__module__ / task.func.__name__Jan 7, 2024
Andrew-S-Rosen
changed the title
Suggestion: Make the default name for @tasks be task.func.__module__ / task.func.__name__
Suggestion: Provide a suitable, default namespace for each task
Jan 7, 2024
I see the warning that in the future, the
redun_namespace
variable will need to be set on the module-level and/or thenamespace
provided in the@task
. Personally, I would like to make an alternate suggestion: make the defaultnamespace
for eachtask
betask.func.__module__
. The combination of the__module__
in thenamespace
and the__name__
in thename
will yield a unique identifier in virtually all practical cases.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: