Quality is important. Therefore we urge you to follow these guidelines if you want to contribute to this project.
- If you are working on a submodule, name it at the beginning: "ixi: refuse ict if already connected to other ict".
- If you fixed a bug, use "fix: ...", like this: "rmi: fix: sending name of ixi instead of ict to ixi".
- "fix: spelling of the word 'contributions' in README.md" instead of
"fixed bug". "minor changes"(which changes?).- Keep commit names short and expressive, use the commit message for long texts instead.
- A commit should contain a self-contained change. So complete and commit a single task first before starting a new one - instead of mixing them together.
- Avoid excessive over-committing. Most commits should represent work that has been done within a 30-180 minute timeframe. Do not push 10 tiny commits with very few line changes. Instead, try to pack them into a bigger commit if possible. Depending on context, exceptions are possible here.
- Before committing, all unit tests must be run successfully and the code must be reformatted (according to section Syntax).
- Where feasible, write a unit test which captures the essence of your changes.
We follow the "Clean Code" guidelines by Robert C. Martin:
- We use 4-space indentation.
- Opening brackets are on the same line.
public void myFunction() { // <--- '{' on same line
// <-- 4 spaces
}
- Names are important. Keep them short and expressive.
- Avoid abbreviations.
catch(Throwable t) { ... }
is fine though. - method names should include verbs:
validateSignature()
. - Boolean attributes and simple queries should start with "is":
public boolean isValid()
- Data must be encapsulated where possible.
- Public attributes must be avoided. Exceptions: Data Objects (e.g. Transaction) and Builders (e.g. TransactionBuilder). Public attributes of Data Objects should be final.
- The inner workings of a class should be hidden as much as possible. Provide a public interface to operate on objects but keep the implementation secret.
- Visibility should be as private as possible. Only methods that are supposed to be called externally should be public.
- If you need to call a method from your jUnit tests, you are of course allowed to make them package-private.
- Keep parameters as low as possible.
- Methods should very rarely have more than 2 parameters. If you need more, consider building a separate class (e.g. Transfer.BalanceChangeCollector).
- Avoid spaghetti code! Methods should ideally have 3-7 lines of code. Use a hierarchical divide-and-conqueer strategy to separate them (see code example below).
- Avoid code duplication by moving duplicate code into a new method and calling it multiple times instead.
- Avoid nested blocks (if/else within loop within try/catch within loop). Try to have no more than one or two blocks within each method.
- Each method should only do one well-defined thing. Avoid
waterFlowersAndGoToWorK()
.
// ===== Bad Code Example (Spaghetti Code) =====
public void makeSpaghetti() {
buySpaghetti();
buyCheese();
buySouce();
pot.fillWithWater();
hotPlate.activate();
while(!pot.isBoiling())
try {
Thread.sleep(20000);
} catch(InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
pot.putInSpaghetti()
try {
Thread.sleep(300000);
} catch(InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
while(!pot.isContentBoiled())
try {
Thread.sleep(60000);
} catch(InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
// ...
}
// ===== Good Code Example (Clean Code) =====
public void makeSpaghetti() {
buyIngredients();
boilSpaghetti();
// ...
}
private void buyIngredients() {
buyIngredients();
buySpaghetti();
buyCheese();
}
private void boilSpaghetti() {
boilWater();
pot.putInSpaghetti()
waitUntilBoiled();
}
private void boilWater() {
pot.fillWithWater();
hotPlate.activate();
while(!pot.isBoiling())
sleep(20000);
}
private void waitUntilBoiled() {
sleep(30000);
while(!pot.isContentBoiled())
sleep(60000);
}
private static void sleep(long ms) {
try {
Thread.sleep(ms);
} catch(InterruptedException e) {
e.printStackTrace();
}
}
Notice how long you need to figure out how makeSpaghetti()
works in the first example and how easy it is to spot what it does in the second example?
We also avoided duplication of Thread.sleep()
. And the itendation level is lower because we don't have nested blocks (try/catch block within a loop).
- Avoid god classes. Keep classes slim (no more than 100-200 lines of code).
- Each class should have a well defined responsibility.
- Each class should be well separated from other classes and have few dependencies to others.
- A package should ideally contain 3-7 classes but no more than 10. Otherwise distribute your classes across sub-packages.
- Consider using nested classes where it makes sense to make things appear more simple from outside.
- Classes and public methods should have a JavaDoc comment.
- use
@param
,@return
,@throws
- use
@link{}
instead of plain text names - optionally use
@see
if it helps - do not use
@version
,@author
- use
- Use comments sparingly. Your code should be expressive enough to not require comments. Sometimes, a comment is necessary though (see the good code example where the comment prevents others from accidentally breaking the code).
- Use
// TODO: ...
if something is not implemented yet. But make sure others understand what meant.
// ===== Bad Code Example (Useless Comments) =====
/**
* This method makes spaghetti.
*/
public void makeSpaghetti() {
// first buy ingredients
buyIngredients();
// then boil rice
boilSpaghetti();
// TODO: fix that bug that occured yesterday
}
// ===== Good Code Example (Helpful Comment) =====
synchronized (queue) {
// keep queue.isEmpty() within the synchronized block so notify is not called after the empty check and before queue.wait()
queue.wait(queue.isEmpty() ? 0 : Math.max(1, queue.peek().sendingTime - System.currentTimeMillis()));
}
Notice the "rice" instead of "spaghetti"? This method was copied from makeRice()
, the author just forgot to adjust the comment.
Someone might see this comment and change boilSpaghetti()
into boilRice()
, thus breaking the method. Comments require
constant maintaining, otherwise they turn into lies. That's why we try to avoid them.