Move to new Github organization

[Dr-Electron]

The Wiki with the latest developments is going to be way more than just a wiki. We may have own plugins, own themes, own tutorials, own videos and so on.
So it may make sense to move away from the iota-community repo.
Wdyt?
And if we do that, what should be the name of the new org?

[kilianhln]

Especially since we create an own repository for each tutorial, a separate organization sounds like a good idea. Maybe we should involve Antonio in this discussion ? For the Name: I am happy with iota-wiki , looks like it is not taken so far.

[jlvandenhout]

Yes let's not complicate it, just call it iota-wiki. Let's list the things we need to think about for a successful transfer:

• CNAME registration
• Docusaurus config
• ...

[Dr-Electron]

Btw the only reason I thought about not calling it iota-wiki is that I don't like https://github.com/iota-wiki/iota-wiki 😅

[jlvandenhout]

• CNAME registration? Don't we just change the repo settings?

Just listing things that came to mind, not necessarily relevant. But afaik we publish to GitHub pages right? So if we change the organization, the GitHub pages location changes as well, which is why I thought the CNAME must also be configured to resolve to the new location.

• We should probably generalise this. Why don't we leave it default?

I think this is a leftover from an earlier version of the Editor, by now I changed it to default to the organization name as commented above the setting, so we could remove it indeed.

• Maybe we an also use a more configurable/general solution here?

Not sure how though, it needs to be set, else Docusaurus removes the edit link altogether and we can't reference the organization and repo names here, so I think it has to be explicit.

[jlvandenhout]

Btw the only reason I thought about not calling it iota-wiki is that I don't like https://github.com/iota-wiki/iota-wiki 😅

But when we move to the iota-wiki organization it makes more sense to me to rename the repo anyways. If we are going to refactor the repo into several logical repos, we'd call them iota-wiki/build, iota-wiki/docs (or iota-wiki/content?), iota-wiki/graphics, iota-wiki/theme, etc. for example.

[Dr-Electron]

Which repo would contain the main stuff tho? We would always need a iota-wiki/iota-wiki repo, right?
Hmmm, o maybe iota-wiki/core. Back to fancy names it is. I'm happy

[jlvandenhout]

If it makes you happy, I'm happy! 😆

[Dr-Electron]

Me wanting fancy names.
Jeroen: 🔨

[Dr-Electron]

Final decision was made on the wiki call in IOTA discord today. We will move to the https://github.com/iota-wiki organization.
ToDo:

• Update the wiki cli
• Update the docusaurus config
• Move