Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow cycling on footways #302

Closed
Robinlovelace opened this issue Nov 5, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

Allow cycling on footways #302

Robinlovelace opened this issue Nov 5, 2022 · 4 comments

Comments

@Robinlovelace
Copy link
Contributor

Robinlovelace commented Nov 5, 2022

In some cases, e.g. when researching safe routes to school, it is useful to allow cycling on footways. This is especially the case in places where tagging is not complete. For example, this footpath in Leeds is definitely cyclable and a nice place to go by bike, with good surface quality and plenty of width for walking and cycling and more, in fact it's a place where many people first learn to ride a bike: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306849934#map=17/53.81989/-1.52460

But {r5r} prevents calculation of trips on it currently, as shown below. Any way to change that?

@Robinlovelace
Copy link
Contributor Author

Robinlovelace commented Nov 5, 2022

Even less realistic, I notice that this way is a no go for cycling according to R5. It seems to happen where the road becomes one way for driving, it splits in 2 but is the same road and just as cyclable. This does not make sense: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/615612433

@rafapereirabr
Copy link
Member

Hi @Robinlovelace , thanks for carefully looking into this. It looks like an important improvement , but I'm afraid this cannot not be done from the r5r side. I think this should perhaps be an issue upstream in R5.

@Robinlovelace
Copy link
Contributor Author

No problem @rafapereirabr thanks to you+team for the development and continued work on the great package. I'll open an issue upstream. FYI I did make changes to the OSM data, adding bicycle=yes that should make it routable. No idea re. the one way driving route though, will ask the R5 people.

@Robinlovelace
Copy link
Contributor Author

Superseded by conveyal/r5#836

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants