-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow cycling on footways #302
Comments
Even less realistic, I notice that this way is a no go for cycling according to R5. It seems to happen where the road becomes one way for driving, it splits in 2 but is the same road and just as cyclable. This does not make sense: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/615612433 |
Hi @Robinlovelace , thanks for carefully looking into this. It looks like an important improvement , but I'm afraid this cannot not be done from the r5r side. I think this should perhaps be an issue upstream in R5. |
No problem @rafapereirabr thanks to you+team for the development and continued work on the great package. I'll open an issue upstream. FYI I did make changes to the OSM data, adding |
Superseded by conveyal/r5#836 |
In some cases, e.g. when researching safe routes to school, it is useful to allow cycling on footways. This is especially the case in places where tagging is not complete. For example, this footpath in Leeds is definitely cyclable and a nice place to go by bike, with good surface quality and plenty of width for walking and cycling and more, in fact it's a place where many people first learn to ride a bike: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/306849934#map=17/53.81989/-1.52460
But {r5r} prevents calculation of trips on it currently, as shown below. Any way to change that?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: