You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In this issue, I document my experiments in training and testing a region-based nnUNet.
The model takes into input a Nifti image and outputs the spinal cord (value=1) and the MS lesions (value=2).
The fact that it is region-based means that lesions must be in the spinal cord.
The necessary steps to take are :
Segment SC for images which have lesion seg but no SC seg (with SCT v6.2)
Manually correct the SC segs
Build an nnUNet dataset
Train a 2D region-based nnUNet (with normal loss and no smoothing loss)
Train a 3D region-based nnUNet (with normal loss and no smoothing loss)
Test model on test set
Compare model performances
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In the CanProCo dataset as well as in the stc-testing-large dataset, some subjects were missing a SC segmentation.
For the 33 CanProCo subjects, the SC was segmented using the region-based model trained on CanProCo (release).
They were then manually corrected and pushed to CanProCo on branch plb/add_sc_seg_for_regionbased
For the 186 sct-testing-large subjects, the SC was segmented using the contrast-agnostic-sc-seg model from SCT v6.2. They were then manually corrected and pushed to sct-testing-large on branch plb/add_sc_seg_for_regionbased
In this issue, I document my experiments in training and testing a region-based nnUNet.
The model takes into input a Nifti image and outputs the spinal cord (value=1) and the MS lesions (value=2).
The fact that it is region-based means that lesions must be in the spinal cord.
The necessary steps to take are :
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: