Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Issue with BITFAM function #15

Open
sugarglider12 opened this issue Nov 21, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Issue with BITFAM function #15

sugarglider12 opened this issue Nov 21, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@sugarglider12
Copy link

Hi, I was wondering if anyone has seen this issue before. After loading in my normalized seurat object, loading the relevant packages, I get the following error when running the BITFAM() command.

BITFAM_res <- BITFAM(data = normalized_data_matrix, species = "human", scATAC_obj = NA, ncores = parallel::detectCores())
Calculating gene variances
0% 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%
[----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|
**************************************************|
Calculating feature variances of standardized and clipped values
0% 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100%
[----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|----|
**************************************************|
Warning: The following arguments are not used: drop
Error in h(simpleError(msg, call)) :
error in evaluating the argument 'i' in selecting a method for function '[': comparison (!=) is possible only for atomic and list types

Additionally, the preprocessing command produces a similar issue:

data_matrix_normalized <- BITFAM_preprocess(raw_data = d_matrix)
Error in h(simpleError(msg, call)) :
error in evaluating the argument 'x' in selecting a method for function 'colSums': comparison (>) is possible only for atomic and list types

My R version is 4.3.0.

@tobylanser
Copy link

Hi @sugarglider12 . I also have this issue. Have you since fixed the problem?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants