Add automatic ports

[dancrumb]

No description provided.

[dancrumb]

Once #74 is ready, this becomes a little clearer. Automatic Ports then become a subtype of Ports.

[dancrumb]

Network will need to be updated to support the creation of connections with automatic ports, probably with some kind of notation to indicate that a port is automatic

[jpaulm]

The asterisk notation should be OK...? E.g.
network.connect(Writer, '*', Reader, '*', 5);
or
network.sconnect('Writer.*', 'Reader.*', 5);

Or have you taken care of that already?

[dancrumb]

I like that.

I haven't done it yet, since this isn't strictly specified somewhere. However, I don't see that as a reason not to proceed. If folks push to go in another direction (why would then?), the code can be modified accordingly

[jpaulm]

Sounds great! Thanks!

On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 2:07 PM, Dan Rumney [email protected] wrote:

I like that.

I haven't done it yet, since this isn't strictly specified somewhere.
However, I don't see that as a reason not to proceed. If folks push to go
in another direction (why would then?), the code can be modified accordingly

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#75 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe/AATGJzGN5Rl3NnRM-GU02nqR-InhSuxOks5qJwT0gaJpZM4IwbRo
.