Confusion with cfg_target_has_atomic

[FeldrinH]

There seems to be some kind of mixup on the site about cfg_target_has_atomic. The tracking issue linked (cfg(target_has_atomic = ...)) was stabilized in Rust 1.60, but the site says the feature is unstable. I suspect the actual tracking issue should be rust-lang/rust#94039 (cfg(target_has_atomic_load_store = ...)).

[jplatte]

There's unfortunately bound to be many features that have been stabilized by now but aren't reflected on the site. I haven't been updating it actively in a long time. https://releases.rs/ largely fulfills the same role nowadays.

I suppose I should put up a clear disclaimer.