We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
x-ref https://discourse.julialang.org/t/highs-jl-gives-strange-results/112995
julia> using HiGHS julia> model = Highs_create() Ptr{Nothing} @0x00007fab448a6c00 julia> Highs_addCol(model, 0.0, -Inf, Inf, 0, C_NULL, C_NULL) Running HiGHS 1.7.0 (git hash: 50670fd4c): Copyright (c) 2024 HiGHS under MIT licence terms 0 julia> Highs_addCol(model, 0.0, -Inf, Inf, 0, C_NULL, C_NULL) 0 julia> Highs_changeObjectiveSense(model, kHighsObjSenseMaximize) 0 julia> Highs_passHessian( model, 2, 1, kHighsHessianFormatTriangular, Cint[0, 1, 1], Cint[1], [1.0], ) 0 julia> Highs_run(model) Coefficient ranges: Cost [0e+00, 0e+00] Bound [0e+00, 0e+00] Iteration, Runtime, ObjVal, NullspaceDim 0, 0.000229, 0.000000, 2 2, 0.000256, 0.000000, 2 Model status : Optimal Objective value : 0.0000000000e+00 HiGHS run time : 0.00 0 julia> Highs_getModelStatus(model) 7
This should error.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Closing in favor of upstream, since this doesn't seem like a HiGHS.jl bug. I initially wasn't sure.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
x-ref https://discourse.julialang.org/t/highs-jl-gives-strange-results/112995
This should error.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: