Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MILP capacity expansion problem benchmark #16

Open
kdheepak opened this issue Sep 22, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

MILP capacity expansion problem benchmark #16

kdheepak opened this issue Sep 22, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@kdheepak
Copy link

kdheepak commented Sep 22, 2024

I have a .lp file generated from Pyomo (using openTEPES - https://github.com/IIT-EnergySystemModels/openTEPES/) that is an order of magnitude slower than a commercial solver, and was wondering if it'd be useful to include as a benchmark.

I've attached the file here (20mb zipped, 425mb unzipped): run1-lp-file.zip

It takes roughly 60 minutes to run on a Mac with HiGHS. On Windows, this hangs indefinitely. I left it running for a few hours and then killed the process, I believe the hanging is related to this issue: ERGO-Code/HiGHS#1044.

With a commercial solver, this lp file solves in a few minutes.

fwiw there's a smaller problem with the same formulation (i.e. same constraints but over fewer time periods - 1 week instead of 1 year) that you can run in a few minutes with HiGHS here: https://github.com/IIT-EnergySystemModels/openTEPES/blob/6f70339e11daaea3f372c06e035dd9a021b6d4b1/tests/test_run.py

@joaquimg
Copy link
Member

Thanks! Our focus will be mps files that we can generate with JuMP, but this will be useful.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants