You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We have hardcoded kubespawner to monitor pods with the label component: singleuser-server. It would be good if we instead allowed what we search for to be configurable. I know this has been relevant for a minority of z2jh users who wanted to deploy multiple hubs in the same k8s namespace for example, but I'd also like it so that we can update the old label scheme component to the modern app.kubernetes.io/component label.
I think we should introduce a configuration to represent what pods we monitor and manage based on label selection.
Related
KubeSpawner.component_label configuration
k8s matchLabels, for Deployment resources for example, declaring how they via labels identify the resources they are controlling
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
We have hardcoded kubespawner to monitor pods with the label
component: singleuser-server
. It would be good if we instead allowed what we search for to be configurable. I know this has been relevant for a minority of z2jh users who wanted to deploy multiple hubs in the same k8s namespace for example, but I'd also like it so that we can update the old label schemecomponent
to the modernapp.kubernetes.io/component
label.I think we should introduce a configuration to represent what pods we monitor and manage based on label selection.
Related
KubeSpawner.component_label
configurationmatchLabels
, for Deployment resources for example, declaring how they via labels identify the resources they are controllingThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: