We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Describe the bug A clear and concise description of what the bug is.
https://github.com/k8snetworkplumbingwg/whereabouts/blob/master/pkg/node-controller/controller.go#L436 should use ipamConf.IPRanges[0].Range instead of ipamConf.Range like the if block above it that checks for the change to spec
ipamConf.IPRanges[0].Range
ipamConf.Range
Expected behavior A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.
Whereabouts node controller should handle spec changes
To Reproduce Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Environment:
kubectl version
uname -a
Additional info / context Add any other information / context about the problem here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks @xagent003 for finding this, please help raise MR to fix 👍
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Describe the bug
A clear and concise description of what the bug is.
https://github.com/k8snetworkplumbingwg/whereabouts/blob/master/pkg/node-controller/controller.go#L436 should use
ipamConf.IPRanges[0].Range
instead ofipamConf.Range
like the if block above it that checks for the change to specExpected behavior
A clear and concise description of what you expected to happen.
Whereabouts node controller should handle spec changes
To Reproduce
Steps to reproduce the behavior:
Environment:
kubectl version
): N/Auname -a
): N/AAdditional info / context
Add any other information / context about the problem here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: