We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Ongoing questions that I have:
Is there a more intelligent way to choose the limits to fit the Gaussian?
Currently, the code is using points that should be in another spectrum to be in its own spectrum. It is not at all clear why this is. See this
The routine that removes overlapping spectrum is very insufficient for more subtle spectra. How can we make this more robust?
Of the new .fits files, for which ones is it successful?
Why are there spots in the spectrum where the peak is not detected?
Why is it important to plot the widths of the Gaussian fitted for each peak vs. the x value?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
kaashmonee
No branches or pull requests
Ongoing questions that I have:
Is there a more intelligent way to choose the limits to fit the Gaussian?
Currently, the code is using points that should be in another spectrum to be in its own spectrum. It is not at all clear why this is. See this
The routine that removes overlapping spectrum is very insufficient for more subtle spectra. How can we make this more robust?
Of the new .fits files, for which ones is it successful?
Why are there spots in the spectrum where the peak is not detected?
Why is it important to plot the widths of the Gaussian fitted for each peak vs. the x value?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: