You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
If in a process list of several pages, the status of some (for example four) selected processes is changed up or down, the position of the processes in the list changes.
In several attempts, the processes of the first page moved on the third page of the process list.
In some attempts, the selected processes did not change.
Solution
Processes in the process list should not change the position after their status has been set. Regardless of the number of processes or lenghths of the process list.
Not really.
In this case, the staus of two processes from the first page was changed and the processes were found on page three. The list was not sorted or filtered.
It might rather be related to #3417, because another factor for the sorting was created, which causes a new sorting position.
Problem
If in a process list of several pages, the status of some (for example four) selected processes is changed up or down, the position of the processes in the list changes.
In several attempts, the processes of the first page moved on the third page of the process list.
In some attempts, the selected processes did not change.
Solution
Processes in the process list should not change the position after their status has been set. Regardless of the number of processes or lenghths of the process list.
See also: #3427
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: