Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Charis SIL might be worth giving a try #3

Open
ghost opened this issue Feb 8, 2019 · 6 comments
Open

Charis SIL might be worth giving a try #3

ghost opened this issue Feb 8, 2019 · 6 comments

Comments

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Feb 8, 2019

Hello,

As my title implies, the open font Charis SIL, based on Bitstream Charter, might be worth giving a try as one of the default KOReader fonts.

Best regards.

@tigran123
Copy link
Member

There are so many nice fonts and just as many different tastes, that I doubt anyone would use the default font that comes in any software. I, for example, always change the default (in both Koreader and CoolReader) to something like Baskerville 10 Pro for most of my reading. But sometimes (especially for Russian books) I like to switch to the old good Academy or even the beautiful (especially for books with lots of text in italics) Adobe Garamond Premier Pro family.

I am NOT objecting to your suggestion. Btw, I tried Charis SIL and it looked "okay", but Baskerville 10 Pro is, imho, still better for English texts (but it is commercial, unfortunately).

@Frenzie
Copy link
Member

Frenzie commented Feb 8, 2019

There's this pseudo-Baskerville, btw.
http://www.tug.dk/FontCatalogue/librebaskerville/

I prefer Tex Gyre Pagella, a Palatino lookalike:
https://www.fontsquirrel.com/fonts/tex-gyre-pagella

@NiLuJe
Copy link
Member

NiLuJe commented Feb 8, 2019

Yeah, the "default" font choice is made more in terms of unicode coverage than how nice it looks ;).

Hence Noto ;).

(Plus, I don't think we want to add yet another font to the mix, as fonts already take up far too much space in our packages ;)).

@pazos
Copy link
Member

pazos commented Mar 6, 2020

Speaking of unicode. I did notice that @baskerville updated a unicode test epub in plato. See https://github.com/baskerville/plato/blob/master/contrib/unicode_test.epub.

I just played a bit with that file and how noto fonts worked with it. Not impressed. Searching in wikipedia for unicode coverage I found Code2000, which covers most of the glyphs. On the wiki page it says there's no official download site but can be downloaded from https://fonts2u.com/code2000.font.

Are you aware of this font?. I think it is awesome and weights less than 3MB.

@NiLuJe
Copy link
Member

NiLuJe commented Mar 6, 2020

Yep, license makes it unredistributable/unusable IIRC.

(It's also not particularly pretty IMHO (and, worse in my book, has weird metrics), but it does have massive coverage).

@NiLuJe
Copy link
Member

NiLuJe commented Mar 6, 2020

Otherwise, there's GNU Unifont, which is really not pretty in its TTF variant since it's a bitmap font at heart, but does aim for full coverage ;).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants