-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
linux-altera-5.4 unable to find file file://lbdaf.scc #165
Comments
no, i missed it
…On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 12:31 PM Khem Raj ***@***.***> wrote:
Can you backport 831a90a
<831a90a>
to thud ?
@dwesterg <https://github.com/dwesterg> is this intentionally missing on
thud ?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#165?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAJNSROTB75T5GKE32TDOT3RCRMDHA5CNFSM4KSDCE42YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOELSI3OY#issuecomment-585403835>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJNSRNUQW3L6BNA6BSHFD3RCRMDHANCNFSM4KSDCE4Q>
.
|
i will fix this in a separate patch, cherry-picking isnt applying cleanly.
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 1:08 PM Dalon Westergreen <[email protected]>
wrote:
… no, i missed it
On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 12:31 PM Khem Raj ***@***.***>
wrote:
> Can you backport 831a90a
> <831a90a>
> to thud ?
> @dwesterg <https://github.com/dwesterg> is this intentionally missing on
> thud ?
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#165?email_source=notifications&email_token=AAJNSROTB75T5GKE32TDOT3RCRMDHA5CNFSM4KSDCE42YY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOELSI3OY#issuecomment-585403835>,
> or unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJNSRNUQW3L6BNA6BSHFD3RCRMDHANCNFSM4KSDCE4Q>
> .
>
|
Thanks @dwesterg @bernardoaraujor can you update to latest thud and retry |
Hello all! I just stumbled across this issue here and wanted to check if this fragment is really needed? I've already submitted the patch for this cb46b0991c273a001e73ca9cd44b067e2c596892 against mainline, so the large block device support should be enabled by default in the mainline kernel. @kraj @dwesterg I guess you can drop this fragment from the layer. -- andrey |
yes, looks that way. Thanks.
…On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:11 PM Andrey Zhizhikin ***@***.***> wrote:
Hello all!
I just stumbled across this issue here and wanted to check if this
fragment is really needed? I've already submitted the patch for this
cb46b0991c273a001e73ca9cd44b067e2c596892
<https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=cb46b0991c273a001e73ca9cd44b067e2c596892>
against mainline, so the large block device support should be enabled by
default in the mainline kernel.
@kraj <https://github.com/kraj> @dwesterg <https://github.com/dwesterg> I
guess you can drop this fragment from the layer.
-- andrey
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#165 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJNSRIEXTT5PUNKPR5YZATRNU2KHANCNFSM4KSDCE4Q>
.
|
The two older kernels (4.14 ones) still require this.
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 6:34 AM Dalon Westergreen <[email protected]>
wrote:
… yes, looks that way. Thanks.
On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 11:11 PM Andrey Zhizhikin <
***@***.***> wrote:
> Hello all!
>
> I just stumbled across this issue here and wanted to check if this
> fragment is really needed? I've already submitted the patch for this
> cb46b0991c273a001e73ca9cd44b067e2c596892
> <https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/?id=cb46b0991c273a001e73ca9cd44b067e2c596892>
> against mainline, so the large block device support should be enabled by
> default in the mainline kernel.
>
> @kraj <https://github.com/kraj> @dwesterg <https://github.com/dwesterg>
> I guess you can drop this fragment from the layer.
>
> -- andrey
>
> —
> You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
> Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
> <#165 (comment)>,
> or unsubscribe
> <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJNSRIEXTT5PUNKPR5YZATRNU2KHANCNFSM4KSDCE4Q>
> .
>
|
so perhaps it will be good to have a patch for this. |
yes, i am also thinking of just removing the older kernels as they will not
be supported for much longer in any case as the newer lts kernels have been
made available.
I will remove the lbdaf.scc from the kernels that dont need it for sure.
…--dalon
On Tue, Apr 21, 2020 at 10:41 AM Khem Raj ***@***.***> wrote:
so perhaps it will be good to have a patch for this.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#165 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJNSRK3KBAQ2OKUKUUMB4LRNXLGHANCNFSM4KSDCE4Q>
.
|
for dunfell I would interested to drop it yes. |
I'm trying to run a build based on thud branch.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: