Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

✨ Add ability to add new data disks to VM during clone process #3214

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vr4manta
Copy link

@vr4manta vr4manta commented Oct 3, 2024

What this PR does / why we need it:
Add API changes that adds the ability to add new data disks to VMs during the cloning process. These new disks are not present in the vSphere VM Template.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes (optional, in fixes #<issue number>(, fixes #<issue_number>, ...) format, will close the issue(s) when PR gets merged):
Fixes #3213

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. labels Oct 3, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @vr4manta!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-vsphere 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/cluster-api-provider-vsphere has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Oct 3, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @vr4manta. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. label Oct 3, 2024
@chrischdi
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Oct 4, 2024
@chrischdi
Copy link
Member

/test help

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@chrischdi: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-vcsim-govmomi-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-vcsim-supervisor-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-test-main
  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-verify-main

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-apidiff-main

Use /test all to run the following jobs that were automatically triggered:

  • pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-apidiff-main
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-test-main
  • pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-verify-main

In response to this:

/test help

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@chrischdi
Copy link
Member

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-vcsim-govmomi-main
/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-vcsim-supervisor-main

Copy link
Member

@neolit123 neolit123 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please ping once this is ready for review.

@vr4manta vr4manta force-pushed the multi_disk branch 7 times, most recently from 9c0f201 to 1636c16 Compare October 17, 2024 18:13
@vr4manta
Copy link
Author

/test pull-cluster-api-provider-vsphere-e2e-vcsim-govmomi-main

@vr4manta vr4manta marked this pull request as ready for review October 17, 2024 19:38
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Oct 17, 2024
@vr4manta
Copy link
Author

@neolit123
This is ready to start reviewing.

@chrischdi
Copy link
Member

cc @lubronzhan @neolit123 @rikatz , this one should be ready for review (xref CAPV office hours) :-) Thanks @vr4manta for driving this!

@vr4manta
Copy link
Author

/assign @neolit123 @lubronzhan

Copy link
Member

@neolit123 neolit123 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

thanks for the PR @vr4manta
overall seems fine. i've added a few comments around the API and docs/code-comments here and there.

apis/v1beta1/types.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
apis/v1beta1/types.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
apis/v1beta1/types.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/proposal/20241003-data-disk-support.md Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
docs/proposal/20241003-data-disk-support.md Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/services/govmomi/vcenter/clone.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/services/govmomi/vcenter/clone.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/services/govmomi/vcenter/clone.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/services/govmomi/vcenter/clone.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/services/govmomi/vcenter/clone.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please ask for approval from neolit123. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@vr4manta vr4manta force-pushed the multi_disk branch 3 times, most recently from e3c9be0 to 78a0873 Compare October 29, 2024 14:37
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Oct 29, 2024
@vr4manta vr4manta force-pushed the multi_disk branch 3 times, most recently from 6649b60 to f11b363 Compare November 4, 2024 14:54
@vr4manta vr4manta force-pushed the multi_disk branch 7 times, most recently from 4403b59 to 84cddbd Compare November 22, 2024 16:43
@vr4manta
Copy link
Author

@neolit123 @lubronzhan lots of updates are in. Ready for next review. Thanks!

Also, e2e is in, but for some reason, it is not working against the e2e cluster in other PR. When I run these tests locally against my vcenter, it all seems to work. I cannot access the logs from the e2e run due to what looks like IP / VPN. Is someone able to check that and help me diagnose it? Thanks!

apis/v1beta1/types.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
apis/v1beta1/types.go Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/services/govmomi/vcenter/clone.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/services/govmomi/vcenter/clone.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
ToVersion string
}

var _ = Describe("Multi-Disk support", func() {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
var _ = Describe("Multi-Disk support", func() {
var _ = Describe("Ensure govmomi mode is able to add additional disks to VMs [vcsim]", func() {

Can we run this with vcsim and properly name the test?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would assume it can also run with vsim. I'll verify that is working. I'll also update the name.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems that using finder against vcsim doesn't like finding the VMs for some reason. The test works fine against real vCenter, but getting a bad error when trying to work against vcsim. I'm still looking into it, but I may just avoid vcsim for now.

pkg/services/govmomi/vcenter/clone.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/services/govmomi/vcenter/clone.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
}

// If we are here, we did not find a unit number. Return error.
return errors.Errorf("unable to find available unit number")
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
return errors.Errorf("unable to find available unit number")
return errors.New("all unit numbers are already in-use")

Not sure if that's a good error message though.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, I would almost think the template image being already full before attempting to add an additional should never happen, but this is a good safety net in case something strange happens. I was almost leaning towards `no unit numbers are available for use", but if your suggestion makes sense to you, I am ok with it. I'll change this to the new text unless someone else has a better suggestion.

pkg/services/govmomi/vcenter/clone.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkg/services/govmomi/vcenter/clone.go Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add data disks not present in VM template to VM during cloning
5 participants