-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 106
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Create an AppArmor profile for the operator #169
Conversation
@pjbgf: Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: pjbgf The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
46a48fd
to
63b6663
Compare
We may need to try to find a different approach for deploying the operator's own profiles. |
63b6663
to
e064ecf
Compare
@pjbgf: The following test failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
@pjbgf: PR needs rebase. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
@saschagrunert what are your thoughts on this one? Shall we just leave it here until at least kubernetes/kubernetes#97966 is merged? |
I assume it does not have any bad implications for older Kubernetes versions, right? If so, then I'd propose we move forward, rebase and get this in :) |
Issues go stale after 90d of inactivity. If this issue is safe to close now please do so with Send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community. |
@saschagrunert I don't think there would be. But given that the upstream issue is a bit stuck, I will close this issue and may reopen it once we are in a better position. |
What type of PR is this?
/kind feature
What this PR does / why we need it:
Limits the execution powers of the operator, decreasing its attack surface.
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #65
Special notes for your reviewer:
This is an initial profile, however this blocked by kubernetes/kubernetes#97273.
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?
/hold