We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
the continuation version of the traits classes are not just a comfort thing, we actually have a lot of optimization potential. Because continuation style does not force us to create a type in order to retrieve the result of a trait we could actually save work especially if the trait is just calling an intrinsic under the hood. We need a way to reliably detect if an intrinsic such as __is_union exists. here for example https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/include/type_traits not all the clang supported type traits are being used, see here https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang/blob/a38ba9770a70056f9fdd6c71f819e5db45a105e4/test/PCH/cxx-traits.cpp
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
the continuation version of the traits classes are not just a comfort thing, we actually have a lot of optimization potential. Because continuation style does not force us to create a type in order to retrieve the result of a trait we could actually save work especially if the trait is just calling an intrinsic under the hood. We need a way to reliably detect if an intrinsic such as __is_union exists. here for example https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/include/type_traits not all the clang supported type traits are being used, see here https://github.com/llvm-mirror/clang/blob/a38ba9770a70056f9fdd6c71f819e5db45a105e4/test/PCH/cxx-traits.cpp
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: