Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Expose slave mode for individual board execution #321

Open
DanielSank opened this issue Feb 21, 2016 · 8 comments
Open

Expose slave mode for individual board execution #321

DanielSank opened this issue Feb 21, 2016 · 8 comments

Comments

@DanielSank
Copy link
Member

It could be useful to run a board slaved to something else. To support this, it would be nice to allow setting a board to run as a slave directly.

@btchiaro
Copy link
Contributor

+1 to this. That would be really helpful for my RTO calibration
measurements.

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 11:50 AM, Daniel Sank [email protected]
wrote:

It could be useful to run a board slaved to something else. To support
this, it would be nice to allow setting a board to run as a slave directly.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#321.

@DanielSank
Copy link
Member Author

@btchiaro how? I've already written the code (see branch 321) but it would help to know how it will be used.

@btchiaro
Copy link
Contributor

I'd be using a dac instead of the Agilent to output my calibration sin
wave.

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 11:53 AM, Daniel Sank [email protected]
wrote:

@btchiaro https://github.com/btchiaro how? I've already written the
code (see branch 321) but it would help to know how it will be used.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#321 (comment)
.

@DanielSank
Copy link
Member Author

Why do you need an explicit setting for slave mode for that?

@btchiaro
Copy link
Contributor

I latched on to the "individual board execution" in the thread title. I'm
not actually sure that "explicit slave mode" is what I need. I need a
source that continuously outputs a sin wave that is independent of the dacs.

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Daniel Sank [email protected]
wrote:

Why do you need an explicit setting for slave mode for that?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#321 (comment)
.

@DanielSank
Copy link
Member Author

We can already do that :)

@btchiaro
Copy link
Contributor

How do I invoke that functionality?

On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Daniel Sank [email protected]
wrote:

We can already do that :)


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#321 (comment)
.

@DanielSank
Copy link
Member Author

You get a board that's not in he board group, write some SRAM to it, run it with loop=True, and Bob's your uncle. We already talked about this a while ago but you wanted to go with the Agilent.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants