-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Implement Asynchronous Processing #10
Comments
Thanks for opening the issue! |
No problem. If I get some time I can take a look at implementing this as well. Any ideas how you'd like to see something like this implemented? |
Thanks for the offer, it is appreciated but I think I need to do this one. I want it to be in a separate package: |
Note to self: there was an issue on the old package about investigating improving the implementation by using Job Middleware: |
@lindyhopchris Hi! Did you have any plans about it? P.S.: It's amazing and much better than the previous one. Good job! Thank you! |
@zlodes thanks for the feedback, it's really good to hear that it's an improvement - I also prefer the new package! The only thing blocking this is time at the moment. The production APIs I'm working on at the moment don't use the async feature, which is why it hasn't bubbled up to the top of my priorities. It's really difficult for me to estimate at the moment when I might get on to it. |
Hi! Any update on this topic? Any plans to actually add async processing? |
Yeah it's on the list of things I need to work through for #238 - I made progress on that ticket during the summer but have had to put it down again due to other priorities. Planning to pick back up sometime soon. |
Implement Asynchronous Processing as described in the JSON:API Spec recommendation. This exists in the outgoing version of this package but has not been implemented in this version.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: