You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
#34 is easy to do if users clone this repo as a fork rather than a template. That complicates things: should we tell people to use forks instead?
Pros to forking:
Individual devs can more easily update their projects to the latest Twine App Builder code
Git history is a combination of both Twine App Builder's infra code and a dev's game history
Easier for me to get metrics on usage
Pros to templates:
Git history is your own
Developers can't easily see every other public repo using the project
I'm going to sleep on this, but I suspect this means forks are the answer. The primary audience for this tool is people who don't use git; they won't care about commit history.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
#34 is easy to do if users clone this repo as a fork rather than a template. That complicates things: should we tell people to use forks instead?
Pros to forking:
Pros to templates:
I'm going to sleep on this, but I suspect this means forks are the answer. The primary audience for this tool is people who don't use git; they won't care about commit history.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: