You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
This issue will add analysis of auto-correlation of residuals as a parameter estimation validation method. Currently mpcpy.models.RMSE is the only validation method.
The validation method should generate an ACF plot and raw data in a list-like form of ([lag], [ACF]).
See for reference the use in Bacher and Madsen (2011) "Identifying suitable models for the heat dynamics of buildings" Energy and Buildings 43(7), available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.02.005.
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 11:22 AM dhblum ***@***.***> wrote:
This issue will add analysis of auto-correlation of residuals as a
parameter estimation validation method. Currently mpcpy.models.RMSE is
the only validation method.
The validation method should generate an ACF plot and raw data in a
list-like form of ([lag], [ACF]).
See for reference the use in Bacher and Madsen (2011) "Identifying
suitable models for the heat dynamics of buildings" *Energy and Buildings*
43(7), available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.02.005.
@WalterZWang <https://github.com/WalterZWang> Is this something you can
help with?
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#204>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AJTBUKQH4WAKAPDDTDLDZKDRXJLOLANCNFSM4OCBCGQQ>
.
--
Zhe (Walter) Wang
Project Scientist
Building Technology & Urban System Division
Lawrence Berkeley National Lab
This issue will add analysis of auto-correlation of residuals as a parameter estimation validation method. Currently
mpcpy.models.RMSE
is the only validation method.The validation method should generate an ACF plot and raw data in a list-like form of ([lag], [ACF]).
See for reference the use in Bacher and Madsen (2011) "Identifying suitable models for the heat dynamics of buildings" Energy and Buildings 43(7), available at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2011.02.005.
@WalterZWang Is this something you can help with?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: