Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Model Buildings.BoundaryConditions.WeatherData.Validation.DecemberToJanuary (master) fails verification due to coarse number of intervals #4118

Open
AndreaBartolini opened this issue Feb 14, 2025 · 0 comments
Open

Model Buildings.BoundaryConditions.WeatherData.Validation.DecemberToJanuary (master) fails verification due to coarse number of intervals #4118

AndreaBartolini opened this issue Feb 14, 2025 · 0 comments
Assignees
@JayHuLBL

Comments

@AndreaBartolini
Copy link
Contributor

The following variables of the model Buildings.BoundaryConditions.WeatherData.Validation.DecemberToJanuary fail the verification vs the Dymola reference files:

  • weaDat.weaBus.HDirNor
  • weaDat.weaBus.HDifHor

detailed analysis is available in OpenModelica/OpenModelica#13627

The key point is that the number of intervals set in the model seems to be different to the one used to produce the reference file. Can you please check?
@JayHuLBL JayHuLBL self-assigned this Feb 14, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@JayHuLBL JayHuLBL

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@JayHuLBL @AndreaBartolini