You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, thanks for providing the dataset and benchmark for the S2S tasks! I am wondering about the data resolution you used during retraining the data-driven models and calculating the metrics (PW, GC and FCN2). Do you directly use the 1.5 deg resolution data to retrain the models, or do you use the 0.25 deg and intepolate the results to 1.5 degrees?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, thanks for providing the dataset and benchmark for the S2S tasks! I am wondering about the data resolution you used during retraining the data-driven models and calculating the metrics (PW, GC and FCN2). Do you directly use the 1.5 deg resolution data to retrain the models, or do you use the 0.25 deg and intepolate the results to 1.5 degrees?
Hi, thank you for your question. We did not retrain these models, and interpolate the results to the native 1.5-degree resolution of the center's subseasonal models. If you want to get the original 0.25 degree results, you can simply switch off the post-processing steps in the script we released here: https://github.com/leap-stc/ChaosBench/blob/main/scripts/process_sota.py
Hi, thanks for providing the dataset and benchmark for the S2S tasks! I am wondering about the data resolution you used during retraining the data-driven models and calculating the metrics (PW, GC and FCN2). Do you directly use the 1.5 deg resolution data to retrain the models, or do you use the 0.25 deg and intepolate the results to 1.5 degrees?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: