Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Simplify naming of storage components #67

Open
drewshz opened this issue Dec 3, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Simplify naming of storage components #67

drewshz opened this issue Dec 3, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@drewshz
Copy link
Contributor

drewshz commented Dec 3, 2020 •
edited
Loading

All storage components are named ...bridge.storage..., the element "bridge" seems to be unneccessary because there is no other category below "bridge".

Dropping the intermediate would simplify the component and the package name.
@hennejg
Copy link
Member

hennejg commented Mar 8, 2021

Yep, Kevin suggested that as well.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@hennejg @drewshz