example_scripts-Different C rates

[Santiagopeacely]

hello, I am sorry to bother you.
I am a student.I think your team is good for this work,but I need help recently. This problem has been bothering me for a few days.What I need to do?
When the case of different C rates in example_scripts is running, no parameters are changed. Why are the cut-off voltages obtained by three different ratios not about 2.5V, but between 3.1, which can't match the data of journal papers? Why?

[lionsimbatoolbox]

Hello. The simulation you are running assumes thermal dynamics enabled. Try to disable them and re run the simulation. That should drive the 2.5V simulation fine.

[Santiagopeacely]

Hello, I'm sorry to bother you again.
I tried to turn off the thermodynamic model again, the result is still not like the paper, I also tried to adjust the other models to enable and close, still can't achieve the effect in the paper, the result trend is right, but the discharge cut-off voltage is never up to 2.5V, including other cases, and the data results in the paper can not be well matched, I hope you can help me answer. If you can, I'd love if you can provide me with the source code of the case in the paper, and I'd like to try to run it and see if it matches the data in the journal. This is used to deduce the problem.

example_scripts:CarCycling_example2

https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1149/2.0291607jes

[lionsimbatoolbox]

Since it's very initial release, the code has been undergoing refactoring and some of the parameters may have been updated, or new equations introduced. While the code should have kept the backward compatibility, it may be that some of the default values for some of the parameters, or type of model approximations of some equations, changed. My suggestion is to checkout an older version of the framework (either 2.0 or 1.024) and use that as reference.