-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 12
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Default priors with analytical likelihood #244
Comments
Hi! Could you provide some additional information? Any minimal reproducible code or output will be helpful. Thanks! |
Hi! Sure, sorry about the lack of additional info! The model below will sample fine, but if the likelihood is changed to analytical, it will throw the error pasted below the model. I am getting this error on my own dataset and haven't confirmed that it will be reproduced on an example dataset, but I imagine that it would be.
Error:
|
Ok this is just a violation of the a >= 0 by (very likely the initial) some sample in the chain. We were using Bambi defaults here which is probably inappropriate with this probably inappropriate in this case. Thank you for letting us know we will fix that. To sample in the meanwhile you have multiple options:
|
Great, thank you! |
When fitting regression models without specifying priors (assuming that this leads to default priors) models run when using approx_differentiable, but not analytical. For analytical, the error indicates that the a>= 0 check has failed.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: