You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I would like to have your opinion on the way of adding MATCH clauses. At the moment, when we chain ->match() methods you add a comma, to separate the patterns.
It seems that this way of chaining MATCH patterns (with a comma) works well with basic patterns like (node1)-[:directRelation]->(node2). But in my case, I would like to match nodes (with specific labels) which are not directly connected to other nodes (with a different label).
I'm facing a problem with this kind of request:
match (list:List)-[:contains]->(product:Product)
where (ID(list) IN [740])
match (product:Product)-[*]->(product_sector:ProductSector),(product:Product)-[*]->(product_family:ProductFamily),(rating:Rating)-[:object]->(product:Product),(rating:Rating)-[:hasType]->(group:RatingGroup)
where (ID(group) IN [730])
return product.name AS name,product_sector.name AS product_sector,product_family.name AS product_family,group.name AS type, rating.numericalValue AS value
I would like to fetch all products contained in a specific list and I want to match other node information related to each Product like ProductSector, ProductSector but I only want Products which have a Rating and where the ratings belong to a specific RatingGroup.
With this syntax I have "no rows" as result.
I found out (thanks to the nice answers on this topic)
that the use of a comma in a MATCH clause means that we are looking for multiple connected patterns. Example :
MATCH (a)-->(b)<--(c), (b)-->(d) is the equivalent of MATCH (a)-->(b)<--(c)-->(d)
But in my case, I'm looking for unconnected patterns. As inside each MATCH clause, each relationship will be traversed only once, I edited the Cypher.php in order to add automatically a MATCH clause by default.
Moreover I don't use the func_get_args because we lose the ability of supplying default values.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi,
I would like to have your opinion on the way of adding
MATCH
clauses. At the moment, when we chain->match()
methods you add a comma, to separate the patterns.It seems that this way of chaining
MATCH
patterns (with a comma) works well with basic patterns like(node1)-[:directRelation]->(node2)
. But in my case, I would like to match nodes (with specific labels) which are not directly connected to other nodes (with a different label).I'm facing a problem with this kind of request:
I would like to fetch all products contained in a specific list and I want to match other node information related to each
Product
likeProductSector
,ProductSector
but I only wantProducts
which have aRating
and where the ratings belong to a specificRatingGroup
.With this syntax I have "no rows" as result.
I found out (thanks to the nice answers on this topic)
that the use of a comma in a
MATCH
clause means that we are looking for multiple connected patterns. Example :MATCH (a)-->(b)<--(c), (b)-->(d)
is the equivalent ofMATCH (a)-->(b)<--(c)-->(d)
But in my case, I'm looking for unconnected patterns. As inside each
MATCH
clause, each relationship will be traversed only once, I edited the Cypher.php in order to add automatically aMATCH
clause by default.Moreover I don't use the
func_get_args
because we lose the ability of supplying default values.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: