JOSS Paper submission

[lrnv]

@Santymax98 If you want to write this paper with me, here are a few guidelines. Leveraging from the readme, and adding references from our own biliographies, this should not take us more than two to three hours to write.

Take a look here : https://joss.readthedocs.io/en/latest/submitting.html for the details on what to write.

Basically we should include importnat references of the field (Nelsen 2006, Joe 2014, Durante 2017 for the books), and maybe McNeil & Neshlehova, the reerence to the R package, etc.. the bigger the number of references the better.

The summary section should be about 20 lines describing what the paper is about.

You can [@cite_something] from paper.bib, and you should do it a lot, after filling the papeR.bib of course.

The whole paper should only be a few pages, maximum 4 or 5, not much more.

The most important part is the statement of need, where the goal is to justify the existance of the package. basically, you can leverage what is written on the readme (the easiest way to do it) and

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (d930e22) 75.87% compared to head (ed4ea8c) 76.00%.
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

❗ Current head ed4ea8c differs from pull request most recent head 9239d5b. Consider uploading reports for the commit 9239d5b to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #70      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.87%   76.00%   +0.13%     
==========================================
  Files          28       27       -1     
  Lines         572      571       -1     
==========================================
  Hits          434      434              
+ Misses        138      137       -1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.