Update mod_facilitation.qmd

Added more references

mod_facilitation.qmd

@@ -228,15 +228,15 @@ Here are a few microstructures that work well for small group virtual meetings.
 | [What, So What, Now What](https://www.liberatingstructures.com/9-what-so-what-now-what-w/) | **<span style="color:blue">Analytical</span>**, **<span style="color:green">Practical</span>**, **<span style="color:gold">Experimental</span>** | Make sense of past progress or experiences and decide on future actions | What - As a group, compile the facts and observations relevant to the context; So What - Reflect on the facts and their implications, identify patterns, generate hypotheses; Now What - Draw conclusions - What actions make sense? |
 | [Fist to Five](https://gamestorming.com/five-fingered-consensus/) / Gradient of Agreement | **<span style="color:green">Practical</span>**, **<span style="color:red">Relational</span>** | Assess degree of consensus; seek closure | Use when ready to close a discussion or make a decision; Invite participants to rate their level of agreement with a proposal on a scale of 0-5; Five fingers means "absolute, total agreement or support" and a fist means "complete opposition" |
 | Polling | **<span style="color:blue">Analytical</span>**, **<span style="color:green">Practical</span>** | Rank alternatives | Before you start - clarify how you will use the results - are you gathering information or taking a vote to make a decision?; Decide how many votes per person; In person - use sticky dots; Virtually - use +1s in a google doc or a digital polling tool (e.g., Zoom, Mural, slido) |
-| Feasibility-Impact Matrix (see figure below) | **<span style="color:blue">Analytical</span>**, **<span style="color:green">Practical</span>**, **<span style="color:gold">Experimental</span>** | Compare alternatives | Discuss and agree on definitions for two criteria for evaluating ideas: feasibility of implementation and impact potential; Rate each project idea against these two axes and map them on a 2x2 grid |
+| Feasibility-Impact Matrix (see figure below) | **<span style="color:blue">Analytical</span>**, **<span style="color:green">Practical</span>**, **<span style="color:gold">Experimental</span>** | Compare alternatives | Discuss and agree on definitions for two criteria for evaluating ideas: feasibility of implementation and impact potential; Rate each idea against these two axes and map onto 2x2 grid |
 
 <p align="center">
 <img src="images/figure_project-impact-vs-feasibility.png" alt="Graph of impact versus feasibility where both axes range from low to high and the plot area is divided into four equal sections" width="70%"/>
 </p>
 
 ## Techniques for Harvesting Content
 
-As you go, and definitely before your meeting is over, engage your team in synthesizing and capturing the information that has been discussed. This helps you to deepen understanding, document your workflow and decisions, and pick up easily from where you left off. Use a consistent system - like a running notes document linked in the calendar item. Graphics or drawings can be a valuable complement to oral and written content in making thinking visible.
+As you go, and definitely before your meeting is over, engage your team in synthesizing and capturing the information that has been discussed. This helps you to deepen understanding, document your workflow and decisions, and pick up easily next time. Use a consistent system - like a running notes document linked in the calendar item. Graphics or drawings can be a valuable complement to oral and written content in making thinking visible.
 
 <p align="center">
 <img src="images/image_visible-thinking.png" alt="Art of many groups of people with blue speech bubbles connected by an orange amorphous cloud" width="100%"/>
@@ -298,6 +298,8 @@ Whole group discussion (10 mins)
 
 ### Papers & Documents
 
+- Khuri et al., [Inclusive Practice Glossary for Facilitators] (https://collaborativecapacities.com/wp-content/uploads/Inclusive_Practice_Glossary_for_Facilitators-March2024.pdf). **2024**.
+- Cravens, A.E., _et al._, [Science facilitation: navigating the intersection of intellectual and interpersonal expertise in scientific collaboration] (https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-022-01217-1). **2022**.
 - Woodley, L. _et al._, [A guide to using virtual events to facilitate community building: Making a PACT for more engaging virtual meetings and events](https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4987666). **2021**.
 - Tarallo, B. & Monlux, M. Surviving the Horror of Online Meetings: How to Facilitate Good Virtual Meetings & Manage Meeting Monsters. **2021**.
 - Lipmanowicz & McCandless. The Surprising Power of Liberating Structures: Simple Rules to Unleash a Culture of Innovation. Liberating Structures Press. **2014**.
@@ -313,3 +315,4 @@ Whole group discussion (10 mins)
 
 - [Liberating Structures: Including and Unleashing Everyone](https://www.liberatingstructures.com/)
 - [Gamestorming](https://gamestorming.com/)
+- [SciTS and Team Science Resources] (https://www.inscits.org/scits-a-team-science-resources) compiled by INSciTS, the International Network for the Science of Team Science