Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: only use vim.iter if available to avoid accidental breaking change #877

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 18, 2024

Conversation

mehalter
Copy link
Contributor

v3.6.0's release had a breaking change when it changed what version of neovim it supported. This reverts the breaking change if using an older version of neovim but still uses the new, non-deprecated API if it's available. This is particularly important immediately after a release because package managers haven't all caught up to providing 0.10 and it may not be widely available or even used in stable environments until the first path release. I think if we don't want to merge this we should at least revert the v3.6.0 release and tag v4 to indicate the breaking nature of the release.

Thanks so much for all your effort supporting and developing this great plugin!

@dsincl12
Copy link

Ah that explains my issue that just started happening. Thanks for the fix! Please merge this one fast :)

Copy link
Owner

@lukas-reineke lukas-reineke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't really consider this a breaking change, the readme is pretty clear that only the latest stable version is supported.

But there is also no reason not to merge this, thanks.

@lukas-reineke lukas-reineke merged commit ece00d5 into lukas-reineke:master May 18, 2024
8 checks passed
@mehalter mehalter deleted the 0.9-compat branch May 18, 2024 14:31
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants