We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ripemd160_aes.test.tc test fails on Fedora 22, NVidia GTX 970
Modify src/Makefile.am: * add -gencode 50, 52, 53. Remove incompatible 20. * remove --opencc-options -OPT:Olimit=0 $ gutogen.sh $ ./configure && make $ cd test $ ../src/truecrack -t ripemd160_aes.test.tc -c tes -m 4 TrueCrack v3.6 Website: http://code.google.com/p/truecrack Contact us: [email protected] Found password: "tsts" Password length: "4" Total computations: "120"
Correct answer is "test".
This works when "-s 4" is appended, reducing computations from 120 to 81:
$ ../src/truecrack -t ripemd160_aes.test.tc -c tes -m 4 -s 4 TrueCrack v3.6 Website: http://code.google.com/p/truecrack Contact us: [email protected] Found password: "test" Password length: "4" Total computations: "81"
Also, when "-v" is added, the computation for solving it is correct but reported incorrectly.
$ ../src/truecrack -t ripemd160_aes.test.tc -c tes -m 4 -v TrueCrack v3.6 Website: http://code.google.com/p/truecrack Contact us: [email protected] Memory initialization... COUNT PASSWORD RESULT 0 t NO --- Performance: inf p/s, time: 0 s, passwords: 3 ... snip... 59 stst NO --- Performance: inf p/s, time: 0 s, passwords: 81 60 test YES --- Performance: inf p/s, time: 0 s, passwords: 81 61 eest NO --- Performance: inf p/s, time: 0 s, passwords: 81 ... snip... 119 ssss NO --- Performance: inf p/s, time: 0 s, passwords: 81 Found password: "tsts" Password length: "4" Total computations: "120"
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
in Core.c around line 390, why does this occur?
for (k=CORE_minlength;k<wordlength;k++){ maxcombination=1; for (l=0;l<k;l++) maxcombination*=strlen(CORE_charset); offset+=maxcombination; }
I believe this maxcombination is messing up the offset, which then gives the wrong computePwd().
More tests to confirm with index added to incorrect password for reference
→ ../src/truecrack -t ripemd160_aes.test.tc -c tes -m 4 -s 0 TrueCrack v3.6 Website: http://code.google.com/p/truecrack Contact us: [email protected] Found password: "tsts" 99 Password length: "4" Total computations: "120" → ../src/truecrack -t ripemd160_aes.test.tc -c tes -m 4 -s 1 TrueCrack v3.6 Website: http://code.google.com/p/truecrack Contact us: [email protected] Found password: "tsts" 99 Password length: "4" Total computations: "120" → ../src/truecrack -t ripemd160_aes.test.tc -c tes -m 4 -s 2 TrueCrack v3.6 Website: http://code.google.com/p/truecrack Contact us: [email protected] Found password: "tets" 96 Password length: "4" Total computations: "117" → ../src/truecrack -t ripemd160_aes.test.tc -c tes -m 4 -s 3 TrueCrack v3.6 Website: http://code.google.com/p/truecrack Contact us: [email protected] Found password: "tese" 87 Password length: "4" Total computations: "108" → ../src/truecrack -t ripemd160_aes.test.tc -c tes -m 4 -s 4 TrueCrack v3.6 Website: http://code.google.com/p/truecrack Contact us: [email protected] Found password: "test" 60 Password length: "4" Total computations: "81"
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
ripemd160_aes.test.tc test fails on Fedora 22, NVidia GTX 970
Correct answer is "test".
This works when "-s 4" is appended, reducing computations from 120 to 81:
Also, when "-v" is added, the computation for solving it is correct but reported incorrectly.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: