-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 83
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Provide a docker image #29
Comments
But why? A simple binary is not complicated enough? |
@toshsan I'm not sure if you're familiar with the concept of containerized sofware, but having a docker image would simplify its usage. One of the (many) pros is that it does not require the user to install go (and dependencies) on the host machine. You'd simply pull the (latest) image and run the container. The only "complicated" part would be to create a proper |
Well dear containerized everything: this go software is also offered as standalone binary of 8MB under release. If you read beyond the marketing material from docker. There is no significant benefit of running a binary in and out of docker since there is no requirement of any other runtime libraries that could conflict with another system resource. |
Yes I can see the binaries, but that still does not mean a docker image is out of the question. This is just a feature request, and it's up to the owner to decide if it's interesting enough. |
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
I would like to see a docker image for this.
Describe the solution you'd like
Automatically publish a new docker image on each release.
Describe alternatives you've considered
N/A
Additional context
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: