You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When I run the test script on the master branch, as of right now, 2 of the tests will fail, with the isapprox function cited as the error (which, I assume, means the results don't fall within the desired tolerance?). The tests are 5 31 constant sqrt FFT and 5 33 zero sqrt matrix. I recently updated to 1.11.0, so am wondering if this is the cause - does anyone else run into this issue?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I see similar failures on #282 where I updated the CI jobs to use Julia-1.11. I suspect that some rounding errors have changed, and the tolerances were slightly too tight for those couple of tests. Will update on #282 eventually, but don't worry about it for now.
I think the test failures were due to random numbers (that are used to generate some test inputs) changing between Julia versions. To allow performance improvements, the standard random number generators in Julia are not guaranteed to produce the same output between versions, even when they are given the same seed. Going to try to fix this by replacing the random number generators with ones from StableRNGs.jl (which aim to guarantee stability).
When I run the test script on the master branch, as of right now, 2 of the tests will fail, with the
isapprox
function cited as the error (which, I assume, means the results don't fall within the desired tolerance?). The tests are5 31 constant sqrt FFT
and5 33 zero sqrt matrix
. I recently updated to 1.11.0, so am wondering if this is the cause - does anyone else run into this issue?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: