Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

support for sql_92 #32

Open
naveenkumarmarri opened this issue Feb 13, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

support for sql_92 #32

naveenkumarmarri opened this issue Feb 13, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@naveenkumarmarri
Copy link

Hi,

Is there any support for legacy sql systems like mysql and oracle

@rafacarrascosa
Copy link
Member

Hi, sorry for the delay, it is just that I'm on a 1bit/sec connection and this page has just loaded since I opened it on Feb 13.
Not. I'm joking. Sorry for the delay.

Officially: No, Quepy translates to SPARQL and MQL (which is obsolete since Freebase went down).
You might have some luck getting a SPARQL -> SQL translator, there are a few projects that do this.

Cheers!

@chrisspen
Copy link

chrisspen commented Apr 16, 2017

This is unfortunate. I'm also interested in SQL support, since that's what the vast majority of production databases use, and translating a production SQL database to a triple-store so you can use SPARQL isn't feasible. As far as I know, there is no such thing as a "SPARQL -> SQL translator". We're not talking about querying a triple store stored in a SQL database. We're talking about querying an arbitrary non-triple based SQL schema, which is not translatable from SPARQL.

@akanimax
Copy link

I have been looking for a natural language to sql converter and quepy is the closest what I could find. I am actually planning to generate some synthetic data for training a Deep learning network for Natural Language 2 SQL conversion. I found this dataset: https://github.com/salesforce/WikiSQL
Unfortunately, that is very little data. I am currently using quepy in sparql mode and will later worry about translating those queries into sql.
Since this issue has not been closed, I thought, I'd ask around for other options and views.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants