You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you for releasing the weights attributed to UNI, as well as the fantastic paper. I am having some trouble understanding the use of some of the augmentations used by UNI. This video explaining DINO video timestamp 20:00 mins, suggests that the goal of using a local and global crop for S and T is that the student must learn a more global representation from what is offered, such that small structures shouldn't contribute in favor of a global structure representation. However, in pathology, the small structures matter a lot, like cell nuclei etc. Is this understanding correct? If so, is it necessary to bypass this for a good representation?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you for releasing the weights attributed to UNI, as well as the fantastic paper. I am having some trouble understanding the use of some of the augmentations used by UNI. This video explaining DINO video timestamp 20:00 mins, suggests that the goal of using a local and global crop for S and T is that the student must learn a more global representation from what is offered, such that small structures shouldn't contribute in favor of a global structure representation. However, in pathology, the small structures matter a lot, like cell nuclei etc. Is this understanding correct? If so, is it necessary to bypass this for a good representation?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: