You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
First of all, thanks for maintaining this piece of software.
Then, if I may ask, would it be possible to clarify a bit, and maybe improve, the process used in new releases?
the version numbers seem to be bumped up in an irregular fashion, at least as far as the releases available on Github are concerned. ex: 1.9.9 is followed by 2.2.12 ?
also, there does not seem to be in git any tag mentioning the revisions in between 1.9.9 and 2.2.12
last but not least, there seem to be no release notes / changelog for most releases. Personally, I am a fan of manually curated changelogs, but at least a list of bugs fixed would do (which is generally better than a list of all commits)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
As soon as I'm fixing issue and add extra minor changes, I will stay on 2.5.x version
2.6.x will be release for bigger features like decent replication analysis, template for report, ...
3.0.x should be a big game change: like web service connection or complete rewrite in an other language
Are you OK with this versioning approach ?
P.S: This ugly situation came for my test on auto increment script(Makefile) for release version, I think this issue also help me to clarify my own mind
First of all, thanks for maintaining this piece of software.
Then, if I may ask, would it be possible to clarify a bit, and maybe improve, the process used in new releases?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: