New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

test: Use await/async instead of jest done #4793

Closed

birkskyum opened this issue Oct 2, 2024 · 0 comments · Fixed by #4794

Member

birkskyum commented Oct 2, 2024 •

edited

Loading

This was resolved in

Use platform consistently instead of jest done #4684

New cases done() were re-introduced in this PR since:

Globe final PR #3963

So there is a bit more cleanup here.

birkskyum mentioned this issue

use platform instead of jest.done #4794

Merged

birkskyum closed this as completed in #4794

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment