You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Regarding the recent Reddit post
I think that few ppl have made some valid claims about old passive data on the tree.
I'll start be adressing this commit made by me few days ago a8a9985
Since the data is from a 5 month old video, i think that it should be pruned. At the time I added it thinking that it'll help with rough info about tree data and pathing, but now that we got way more fresh informations about the tree, the old informations (that i presume went trough many balance changes) is straight up misleading.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Regarding the recent Reddit post
I think that few ppl have made some valid claims about old passive data on the tree.
I'll start be adressing this commit made by me few days ago a8a9985
Since the data is from a 5 month old video, i think that it should be pruned. At the time I added it thinking that it'll help with rough info about tree data and pathing, but now that we got way more fresh informations about the tree, the old informations (that i presume went trough many balance changes) is straight up misleading.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: