You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I found your project linked from YMusic player page, saying that they closed-source app is a fork of your source code. It seems to me that they simply took your code, added a few features, re branded it and are now profiting from it without contributing back in any way. Am I correct?
If that is the case, have you considered using a copyleft license? Because in my opinion the Apache license allows this kind of privative behaviours against the spirit of open source.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'd be concerned about switching Jockey's license — there are a lot of implications around revoking current rights, and I don't want to go down a legal rabbit hole. Regardless, I'm very content with the current Apache license that Jockey uses, and it was a deliberate decision to not use a copyleft license.
The original goal in using this license was so that other people could use what they need, and learn from it. Using a copyleft license can prohibit this in a lot of circumstances where it isn't possible for the derivative work to be open source (for example, if a larger company ended up borrowing code from Jockey or in situations where the derivative work is a paid product). There have been a few instances I'm aware of where individuals have created low-effort variations of Jockey (sometimes for profit), and I'm not a fan of those. But for forks like YMusic where the changes are non-trivial and there's attribution to Jockey, I'm happy to see them — it shows that Jockey has been helpful to others, and I would argue that not all of the changes belong upstream.
I also feel like I should call out profiting in particular. The goal with Jockey was never to make money, and there are no sources of revenue whatsoever — it was entirely for fun and to fill a gap in what I wanted from other music players. That said, it's indirectly given me a paycheck since it opened the door to my current job, and I don't foresee Jockey gaining a revenue stream in the future. For anybody that forks Jockey, the decision to monetize their work is on them — and I don't feel entitled to anything they make, though an occasional PR is always appreciated 😉.
(I also don't mean to be calling out the author of YMusic, by the way. He has contributed back to Jockey, and you can see his contributions here)
I found your project linked from YMusic player page, saying that they closed-source app is a fork of your source code. It seems to me that they simply took your code, added a few features, re branded it and are now profiting from it without contributing back in any way. Am I correct?
If that is the case, have you considered using a copyleft license? Because in my opinion the Apache license allows this kind of privative behaviours against the spirit of open source.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: